CDCC+SAVAC Present: We Look At Animals Because, curated by Toleen Touq and Nahed Mansour

WE LOOK AT ANIMALS BECAUSE
January 25–March 25, 2018

Featuring Quratulain Butt, Khaled Hourani, Maha Maamoun, Smriti Mehra, Huma Mulji, Ed Panar, Alex Sheriff, and Andrea Luka Zimmerman | Curated by Toleen Touq and Nahed Mansour

In partnership with South Asian Visual Arts Centre (SAVAC), Critical Distance is pleased to present We Look At Animals Because, an exhibition that gazes on animality. Through the lens of spectatorship, the show explores the shifting ways in which animals are regarded, represented and accorded meaning in post-industrial landscapes. Exhibiting photographs, video, works on paper, and sculpture, the featured artists reveal the nuanced, complicated and unexpected paradoxes that mark our relationships with cosmopolitan animals.

Continue reading

The view from here | Season’s greetings from CDCC

Gazing out our third floor window at Artscape Youngplace, we’re reflecting on another whirlwind year and sending heartfelt thanks to everyone who participated, attended, and supported Critical Distance in 2017. We had such a wonderful run of exhibitions, art book fairs, and related events, all made possible by the curators, artists, and organizations we collaborated with, our board and team members working behind the scenes and on the ground/in the gallery to make it all happen, and the art book/edition buyers, funders, contributors, and audiences who help make everything seem both possible and worthwhile.

Special thanks to Alison Cooley, Josée Pedneault, Anthony Stepter, Hailey Kuckein, Noa BronsteinClayton Windatt, Vera Frenkel, Megan Press, Lisa Cristinzo, and the staff at Artscape Youngplace, and everyone at Toronto Art Book Fair and at CONTACT Photography Festival for going above and beyond in working with us. :) Thanks also to the Toronto Arts Council for past and upcoming support for our exhibitions and programs.

Which leads us to… 2018! We have so much in store to round out our landmark 5th year of programming, including our upcoming exhibition, We Look At Animals Because, curated by Toleen Touq and Nahed Mansour. Featuring a selection of fascinating, and often funny, works by Quratulain ButtKhaled HouraniMaha MaamounSmriti MehraHuma MuljiEd PanarAlex Sheriff and Andrea Luka Zimmerman, this exhibition is our first to be produced in partnership with South Asian Visual Arts Centre (SAVAC), and will be on view in the CDCC gallery on the third floor at Youngplace, on the billboard outside our building on Shaw Street, and in our new pop-up screening lounge on Youngplace’s first floor. Save the date for our public opening reception on January 25th from 6–9 pm, and stay tuned for more details, including exhibition-related events to be held at both CDCC and SAVAC, coming soon.

We will also be announcing the rest of the 2017-18 program and other updates on the organization in our Winter newsletter, scheduled for late January — subscribe at www.criticaldistance.ca/news or follow us on Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter to read all about it.

The gallery is now closed through January 24th for holidays and installation of our next exhibition. Office hours are by appointment only. Best wishes from all of us at CDCC for a peaceful and sparkling start to your new year!

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

Interview with Yan Wu

Shanghai-born, Toronto-based curator Yan Wu has worked with Canadian arts institutions including Gendai Gallery, Art Metropole, and Blackwood Gallery, co-curated the Canada Pavilion with Janine Marchessault at the 5th Bi-city Urbanism/Architecture Bienalle in Shenzhen, China in 2013, and was Assistant Curator of the 2015 Shanghai Urban Space Art Season. As a translator, she completed the Chinese translation of Rosalind Krauss’s Passages in Modern Sculpture with James Carl, published in 2016.

With a practice spanning countries and cultures, Wu seemed a natural fit for our December 2016 panel discussion, Facilitating International Practices as an Indpendent Curator for which we asked her and fellow panelists Earl Miller and Xenia Benivolski to consider methodologies employed by local independent curators seeking to facilitate cross-national and cross-continental art projects. Apropos to the topic at hand, Wu was to join us remotely from China, where she was working on a translation project at the time. Due to technical difficulties, however, the connection was lost midway through the discussion and much about Wu’s process had to be left unsaid.

Rather than leave it at that, we decided to invite Yan to participate in a more in-depth interview on her practice as a whole, and this illuminating email conversation initiated by Letticia Cosbert, facilitated by Mirae Lee, and edited by Daniella Sanader is the result. Thanks to everyone who lent a hand to getting this published, and to Yan especially for her patience, equanimity, and thoughtfulness throughout.

Letticia: I’m very interested in your computer science degree. What’s the story there? How did you make the transition into curation and visual art? (Did it feel like a transition, or did it make perfect sense?) How, if at all, have your studies in computer science informed your curatorial practice? Can you give an example of a specific project?

Yan: Haha, I get this question a lot. It’s a long story.

In the late 90s, a few years before I moved to Canada, I was really into the underground rock music scene in China. In my opinion, it was caught in a very interesting moment: it was the tail end of a local avant-garde movement before commercialism took over in the 2000s. It was also the beginning of dial-up internet access at home, and everyone had their first personal email address. There was this small online forum that brought together people from all over the country who really believed in that kind of music. I met so many people, literally from every walk of life in that virtual network. I saved all my allowance at the time to travel those cities to meet them in person, sort of like the “teleporting” in Second Life, but in actual life. It was magical.

In the music scene, on the one hand, the only access to the types of western music we liked was through illegally pirated or cracked cassettes and CDs—they were not officially distributed in China—and all the shows we went to were pretty much illegal as well. Police could come anytime and shut them down. Sometimes they were there with us the whole time, undercover. On the other hand, local indie labels were emerging, producing alternative music from rock to punk and new wave, to postpunk, to experimental, all at the same time. In hindsight, we were operating in a territory that was obviously against the state (or any form of official force), but was yet to be subsumed into the commercial world. It was intense, independent, exciting, and optimistic. And it was never an isolated scene, with close connections to film, theatre, dance, literature, and contemporary art. I was still in my late teens at the time, but surrounded by people in their 20s, 30s, and 40s. My belief in culture in general was shaped by these experiences.

After I came to Canada, I studied computer science and briefly worked in the field. This was more for practical reasons: to sustain a valid status in this country, from international student, to foreign worker, to landed immigrant, to citizen. That process took me almost 10 years. I love computer science and have definitely benefited from studying it: expanding my mental capacity and ability for abstract thinking. As software engineer, we were trained to observe and reproduce processes, and to provide the most efficient solutions to any type of problem. (This can be a constant struggle when working in arts. Sometimes things tend to work in the opposite way, and you need to respect that.) In this sense, my beliefs in culture found their grounding in my early years in China, and my thinking patterns were formed through my years spent with computer science. Together they are the foundation of what I do today, whether in curation or translation.

The transition from computer science to culture started with writing. I was the Toronto correspondent for a Chinese culture magazine for few years while I was still working full time in computer science, covering events like Nuit Blanche, places like Art Metropole, and alternative lifestyles such as heritage seed farming.  One of the first events I organized was a performance of I/O Media, a Toronto local experimental music collective based at InterAccess, in collaboration with Zen Lu, a musician based in Shenzhen, China, live over the internet. My involvement at Gendai Gallery calibrated my focus to visual art, and later to architecture and urbanism. On the day that I was eligible to become a Canadian citizen and no longer need to worry about my status in the country, I quit my day job and became a full-time cultural producer. This is a term I am more comfortable with, instead of “curator”; the latter entails a kind of power dynamic with artists that I would like to distance myself from. The only reason I choose to work in this field is to work with artists, to create occasions for artists to make work, as opposed to using content produced by artists to make my own work. I guess it’s true that, in terms of the final output, one can hardly tell the difference; intention is always invisible. It might sound strange as I even hold a degree in Curatorial Studies. For a very long time, I resisted the title, and invented ways to avoid it. I started my career through being friends with artists, not through art history or any form of institutionalized training. To me, accepting the title felt almost like being a traitor to artists. It was personal, probably still is. I came to terms with it when I started to realize that it’s a profession, and only when I become professional could I truly be capable of assisting artists. Though it’s still a struggle for me today.

Do you consider yourself an “international curator,” or do you see yourself (as I do) as someone who mostly curates in the two countries/cities that you call home? Can you maybe share an anecdote that illustrates the relationship between your practice here and in China?

By default, my practice is international because of my background, and I do work with artists and organizations in both China and Canada. But I am not sure if I would consider myself an “international curator.” Culturally-specific is probably a better way to describe myself. Moreover, on the one hand, all my projects are site-specific on both thematic and practical levels, and are not meant to travel. On the other hand, my focus is on inter-Chinese-Canadian issues and doesn’t go beyond that relationship. I guess because of my bilingual, cross-disciplinary, and cross-cultural background, I believe in differences. Focusing on site-specificity as opposed to universal issues is part of it. It’s almost like I choose regionalism over globalization.

“This is a photo of barricades I found in front of a government building in Bangkok, Thailand during the 2013-14 political crisis. When we got there, the city-wide political protest was put on hold because of the King’s birthday. The entire city was temporarily shifted to a scene of celebration. The barricades couldn’t be removed, because the protest was to resume a few days later after the birthday celebration. So they added some ribbons to the barricades as a temporary solution. It was a very interesting case study of public space to me.”

As a bilingual writer and critic, what is it like to write in two languages? Does either language present certain challenges? I would love to hear some fun anecdotes about phrases, concepts, or words that don’t quite work, or are difficult to convey in one language or the other. Maybe something you’ve come across in your recent translation work?

Nowadays, I would consider both English and Chinese as my first language, depending on the subject. For example, I have no prior knowledge of computer science in Chinese before I came to study in Canada. My entire inventory of related vocabularies is only in English. Normally it’s vice versa. I would say I am a better writer in Chinese than in English. I simply master it better. For a very long period of time, I wasn’t able to harness the emotion inherent in English. Without certain signifiers in place, it almost was an emotionless language to me. Literally. I didn’t know how to express my own emotions through it, and was not able to properly receive/unpack the emotions conveyed by others. Of course, I am referring to more nuanced, subtle situations. For example, when a couple breaks up. J Things have improved. I’m still intimated by grammar, but my thinking capacity in English has expanded, and I have access to more vocabularies and the concepts associated with them.

Most of time, translation is a process of mapping. First, I search for the meaning of a phrase from the home language in the destination language, then I locate an expression in destination language that conveys the meaning. This only works when a parallel meaning or concept exists in the destination language. Otherwise, it becomes more complex. For example, in English, the word individual comes from Latin individuum, meaning: “an atom, indivisible particle.” Its current meaning—”a single human being” (as opposed to a group, etc.)—is from the 1640s, coinciding with the awakening of the concept of human rights. Such a term didn’t exist in Chinese until around 1902, when Chinese reformist Liang Qichao introduced the concept, translating it as “个人”. Before that, “个人” originally meant “myself,” and the translation of “individual” had been inconsistent, mostly appearing as “人,” meaning “human.” The translation of art history and theory books involve similar practices. For instance, a major struggle while working on Rosalind Krauss’s Passages in Modern Sculpture was learning how to clearly articulate the different movements of reductivism (极少主义) and minimalism (极简主义) and to unify the respective translations. Before that, the two terms in Chinese had been interchangeable and constantly misused.

The book translation projects I have been working on are all in collaboration with James Carl. People always wonder how he contributes to the final work and how good his Chinese is, etc. Well, his Chinese is great, but this is just part of the equation and I do end up doing majority of the work. The kind of mapping I mentioned earlier is not a one-way process, but deals with two interfaces, English and Chinese. That’s how we divide our roles in these projects—he is the interface to English (for instance, to activate the emotion of the language, and of course for all the references that otherwise I won’t be able to access) and I am the interface to Chinese. Both are essential and irreplaceable.

You’ve spent the past couple of years doing curatorial residencies—can you speak about what it’s like to temporarily inhabit, so to speak, disparate spaces that are often in different countries, cities, or regions? How does it compare to, say, curating single shows in various places?

That’s an interesting question. All I can say is that I take it for granted, it’s my life. It has always been this way. You go to some place to achieve something. Once you complete it, you move on. Through the process, both you and the place grow. Sometimes you grow together, sometimes you grow apart. It’s natural. The “place” of which had been in my life the longest would be my old car, which I owned for 11 years. Yet even that is now gone, as of last week. I guess my question back to you would be: what it is like to be a permanent inhabitant? From my experience, that is beyond imagination. Maybe I don’t think of what I do as a job. If jobs were what I wanted in life, I might as well have stayed in computer science, where the pay is better. (Of course, I’d advocate that cultural workers must be better compensated for their commitment and flexible labour.)

The residency I have been doing at the Art Museum at the University of Toronto is special to me. The kind of trust we share in order to realize projects didn’t happen overnight. It took us years to develop until the point when the residency began. And now we are seeking ways to extend the research I started during this residency, which can be seen as a case of growing together. In that sense, I am not the type of person who would go to a foreign city or country, or even a “foreign” organization to do a residency. Maybe it is time to revisit the idea that “the world is flat.” As mentioned before, I believe in difference, but not universal themes. It takes time for one to grasp and internalize differences. I do move around, but I’d say vertically, not horizontally.

In the past year alone you were working as a curator in residence at Art Museum, you were an editor for the Chinese magazine Time+Architecture, and you were translating books by Lucy Lippard and Dan Graham for the Sui Jian Guo Art Foundation. First, how do you manage to be (mentally, physically) in so many places at once; and second, how do you actually to stay abreast of the art world and its doings in two very different places–or would you say that you don’t find them that different at all?

Haha, physically I do most of the work you mentioned here at my desk in a working/living apartment on Fuller Avenue in Parkdale, Toronto. Mentally speaking, it’s a matter of project management, trying to be spontaneous and well-organized at the same time (and completely missing out all the local events). Content wise, they are all centred around different conceptions of space, at least from how I read them. After spending time translating Lucy Lippard’s Six Years: The Dematerialization of the Art Object form 1966 to 1972 and some texts by Dan Graham on conceptual art, I’m wondering if “conceptual art” should be added to Rosalind Krauss’s famous diagram in Sculpture in the Expanded Field, alongside to the structural parameters of sculpture, architecture, and landscape art. That’s why I agree to translate these materials in the first place. All the translation work I do is related to my curatorial research. They are reciprocal practices, not distractions.

You chaired a panel recently at York University on Canadian public art in China. Asking selfishly, since I didn’t attend, could you give a brief sketch of what this panel consisted of—at least your portion? What are some ways that Canada and China are in dialogue with one another (or perhaps participating in the same dialogue) regarding public art? How are they disparate? What can we learn from one another—is there a particular frame of thinking that you think each country could benefit from adopting?

I always find the term “public art” so problematic, its implications vary depending on the context. Theoretically, it refers to art that is placed in public space, or art that can generate public space. But nowadays it is increasingly becoming an administrative term, describing art’s funding sources or civic function. Or even worse, a term that represents the leverage between public and private sectors in shaping the city’s built form. I would argue that this notion of public art has nothing to do with art or public space. Art demands autonomy, and public space is not a physical space that can be predetermined or projected. Just as it puzzles me, I am fascinated by how much potential the term “public art” can bear. Actually, I am just about to start a new “residency” as Public Art Coordinator for the City of Markham. For the above reasons, I am very excited and curious at the same time.

As for the panel at the conference, I invited Adrian Blackwell, James Carl, and Yam Lau to share a selection of projects that they initiated, witnessed, or participated in throughout various urban spaces in China from the mid 90s to present. In addition, I introduced a project I did with them and Nestor Kruger for Shanghai’s Urban Space Art Season in 2015. Some of these projects were informally staged to confront the brutal reality of drastic urbanization in China as an artistic expression of public protest, while others were formal invitations to “correct” or improve previous development in the name of regeneration.

Friction and misconception are inevitable by-products of cultural exchange, be it ideological, intellectual, political, and/or artistic. Just like the idea of difference I mentioned earlier. Especially in the context of public art, the expected notions of “public” and “art” are rather site-specific. The purpose of the panel was not necessarily to showcase solutions, but to illustrate these frictions, misconceptions, and related contexts, addressing differences as opposed to celebrating an imagined common ground. For example, some of the early public interventions by Chinese contemporary artists in the 80s and 90s were not about making public spaces. Instead, the inverventions were their way to regain the right to private space. In my mind, accepting and trying to understand this difference could be a productive starting point.

You’ve recently completed your latest curatorial project, Making Models at the Art Museum of the University of Toronto. What were some of the opportunities and challenges that arose in working between disciplines—or working within the resident curator framework—in developing and mounting that exhibition?

It was a big project with a complex structure: a museum exhibition, an outdoor installation, and a competition. The Art Museum had never done anything like this before. For me, I can see the continuity in relation to my past work: the public art project Subtle Gesture, which I produced with four artists and architects on the streets in Shanghai; Comfort Zones, a social-spatial research project at the University of Toronto Mississauga campus; and even the architect-in-residence program we tried at Gendai Workstation many years ago. I was lucky that Barbara Fischer [Executive Director/Chief Curator at the Art Museum] gave me the opportunity and autonomy to experiment with this project, and I’m grateful for her willingness to explore with me. In some ways, it was a risk. We were developing the infrastructure, structure, and content all at the same time. All nine works shown in the project were new, developed specifically for the site. To me, opportunity and challenge are one of the same thing; it shifts depending on one’s mindset.

In Making Models, I was particularly interested in the juxtaposition of art and architecture, and their respective sensitivities. The artists and architects were given the same premise to develop a proposal. What would they do differently? Of course, on a practical level, one can argue about the unequal distribution of resources, as some architecture studios brought in a big team of assistants. But to me, it was part of the reality on display in this project, and it was presented transparently. Also, the convention of the curator’s interpretive voice (a.k.a. the curatorial essay) was deliberately removed in this project. Instead, the curatorial gestures were inserted in the process as a series of design decisions: from the selection of the participants, to the design brief, to the exhibition didactics.

I was curious about the experiential aspects of real time versus representational time in the space of architectural model. It was somewhat like a reality TV show, but more fragmented in both a temporal and spatial sense. Even though the different structural elements of the project all served specific functions throughout the process, they were forms of representation at the same time. Very few people were able to see beyond the literal presentation. I was more interested in what a competition could become, as opposed to establishing another conventional competition. Ultimately, the process is more important to me than the result, which itself is simply the outcome of practicality.

Making Models Postcard 3, 1, 2, Designed by Chris Lee

A sequence of events led to the content of this project. The selection was largely made by the existing context (for example, university administration, jury decision, etc.) As a curator, my contribution was to set up the elements of the situation and participate in it as well. I was wondering how to address the gaps and overlaps between the roles of participant and spectator, and between the realms of creation and reflection.  This interest was not just for the final gallery presentation, but the production process along the way. For example, the artists’ and architects’ presentations for the jury selection day: these were ultimately performance. I wish they were open to the public, and they probably should have been. But doing so without compromising the authenticity of the competition could have been a challenge. CN Tower Liquidation did a fabulous job in their presentation to the jury. Their bodies literally became the medium of the presentation. Yet, it’s very interesting that on one member’s resume, this project was mentioned as an architecture competition. Their proposal was obviously a calculated artistic response, countering built form using bodies and the phenomenon of colour. Herein lies the challenge, for instance, of how to introduce the space of performance into the context of architecture. I see it as a relational space, but the jurors from architectural backgrounds couldn’t make the same connection. And then, the proposals by Public Studio and Terrarea could also be seen as performances. I was impressed by the fact that they were even performing their budget lines as part of the scheme.

Of course, only when the proposal is selected and realized in life-size, it enters the realm of reality. Otherwise, it remains a representation or speculation, like Tatlin’s Tower or Kabakov’s models. How to locate this threshold?

What’s next for you? What are you interested in? What are you excited about now?

The top three items on my 2017/18 To Do List (no particular order):

Finish editing the Chinese translation of Lucy Lippard’s Six Years and finish translating Dan Graham’s Rock My Religion, which are both going to be published in 2018. Both books, especially Rock My Religion, have very much informed my thinking while developing Making Models. Even working on this interview, those excerpts of artist interviews from Six Years were inspirational.

In my new capacity as Public Art Coordinator in Markham, one of my first major tasks is to help the city develop its first public art master plan. It will be a big learning curve for me.

Continue my research and experiments on the intersection of art and architecture, or in Barbara Fischer’s words “spatial practices”, hopefully with the Art Museum.

All very exciting and challenging!


image, top: Photo of Dan Graham’s work in Munster by Yan Wu: “I saw it this summer while I was translating his text. This photo is visual evidence of how I internalized his writing when encountering his work.”

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSaveSaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

CDCC at the 2017 Edition Art Book Fair

Critical Distance at the Edition Art Book Fair
October 26–30, 2017

Featuring Half Letter Press and works by Marc Fischer/Public Collectors and Temporary Services, Magali Duzant, Graphic History Collective with Paul Buhle, Project 40 Collective, Mark Mulroney, Brandon Dalmer & Erin Ornstein, Maggie Groat, and Tings Chak; plus selected publications from Independent Curators International and Cura Magazine; and selected catalogues and editions produced by Typology Projects and Critical Distance Centre for Curators

Continue reading

CDCC Call for Board Members — apply by Nov 8th!

Critical Distance Centre for Curators, a not-for-profit initiative and space devoted to the support and advancement of curatorial practice and inquiry in Toronto, is seeking enthusiastic, self-motivated and collaborative individuals to join the organization’s active Board of Directors. Serving as a Board member provides an exciting opportunity to help shape the future of the organization and contribute to important decision-making processes regarding programming, operations, fundraising, communications and governance. Working closely with CDCC’s Director, Board members will consider short and long-term strategic planning for the organization. Serving as a CDCC Board member provides an opportunity to help grow this emerging organization and contribute to creating equitable practices that will sustainably expand the gallery’s multi-faceted programming.  

Continue reading

Interview with Catherine Heard, Creator of Magic Gumball Machine of Fate, by Mirae Lee

Anyone who has ever come by our space would probably have paused mid-walk in front of the gumball machine standing beside our door. Sparking a nostalgia of childhood enjoyment, or a collectible’s desire, the red gumball machine is inevitably a curiosity-inducing creature. But unlike the typical sweet tooth’s favourites or mini figurines and toys, the Magic Gumball Machine of Fate is filled with plastic balls of $2 surprises, including pieces of the Berlin Wall and cereal box butterflies.

Continue reading

Critical Kombucha and Dirty Soap: Fermenting Feminism Reading Group

Can a Kombucha Workshop be Intersectional? Can a Feminist Live off the Grid? And Other
Fermenting Feminism Questions

Please join us for a tour, curatorial talk, and reading group facilitated by Fermenting Feminism curator Lauren Fournier

Saturday, November 4th from 3-5 pm
Refreshments will be served

Fermenting Feminism is a group exhibition at Critical Distance featuring work by Sharlene Bamboat, Hazel Meyer, Leila Nadir and Cary Peppermint, Sarah Nasby, Kayla Polan, Walter Scott, and Agustine Zegers. Together with exhibition curator Lauren Fournier, workshop participants will discuss of some of the themes related to the Fermenting Feminism project, including what it means to “ferment feminism” today and the politics, aesthetics, and ethics of incorporating fermentation practices into feminist life. Following a brief curatorial tour and talk, the group will come together to discuss some of the key problems raised by Fermenting Feminism that the three readings — one academic article and two shorter texts — flesh out from Black, POC, and trans feminist frameworks, including issues of exit and escape, community, and vibrant life.

The workshop is free but limited to 15 participants — please RSVP to info (at) criticaldistance (dot) ca to reserve your spot. Workshop location will be in a third floor studio at Artscape Youngplace adjacent to Critical Distance, all spaces are accessible. PDFs of the readings will be pre-circulated beforehand to those who are attending.

Continue reading

ACC+CDCC Call for Proposals: Indigenous Curatorial Projects at Critical Distance

Critical Distance Centre for Curators (CDCC) and Aboriginal Curatorial Collective–Collectif des commissaires autochtones (ACC-CCA) are pleased to announce this joint call for proposals for an exhibition or curatorial project to be mounted at CDCC in Spring 2018.

This opportunity is for Indigenous curators, artists, architects, collectives, writers, researchers, and others interested in engaging and expanding curatorial approaches to public programming and exhibition-making within a critical context. Projects that are conceptually experimental or innovative, introduce new artists to Toronto audiences, and deliver theoretical tools to think about contemporary Indigenous art in Canada are highly encouraged.

The selected applicant will receive a curatorial fee of $3000 for curation and writing in support of the project. Artist fees will be paid at 2018 CARCC rates. Further support in the form of a budget for exhibition materials and production (to be developed in collaboration with ACC-CCA/CDCC), installation assistance, design, promotion, and full documentation in an exhibition catalogue to be produced by CDCC will also be provided.

Submission Deadline
Friday, October 27, 2017 at 5 pm EST

Continue reading

CDCC FALL EXHIBITION: Fermenting Feminism | Sharlene Bamboat, Hazel Meyer, Leila Nadir and Cary Peppermint, Sarah Nasby, Kayla Polan, Walter Scott, Agustine Zegers, curated by Lauren Fournier

Critical Distance is thrilled to launch our landmark 5th year of programming with FERMENTING FEMINISM, curated by Lauren Fournier and featuring Sharlene Bamboat, Hazel Meyer, Leila Nadir and Cary Peppermint, Sarah Nasby, Kayla Polan, Walter Scott, and Agustine Zegers.

Kombucha, guts, bacteria, vessels, vitalism, effervescence, degradation, and decay. Fermenting Feminism brings together artists whose work fleshes out the intersections between fermentation and intersectional feminisms. As the process of microbial transformation, fermentation becomes both a metaphor and material practice through which to approach feminist practices in the contemporary. Continue reading

The Site Magazine presents Future Legacies: Design for Canada’s Next 150 Years

Future Legacies: Design for Canada’s Next 150 Years is an exhibition of The Site Magazine’s inaugural design competition, featuring the five winners: Ali Navidbakhsh, Evan Wakelin, Karan Manchanda, Sarah Gunawan, and Shelley Long; plus five runners-up: Anna Longrigg + Jason McMillan, Fionn Byrne, Kyung-Kuhn Lee + Mamata Guragain + Nubras SamayeenMitchell Gray, and Rob McIntosh; and five honourable mentions: Dominique Cheng, Émélie Desrochers-Turgeon, Emma Mendel, Stephanie Mauer, and Studio Ha-ha.

Critical Distance is pleased to facilitate this exhibition in the 3rd Floor Hallway Gallery just outside our door at Artscape Youngplace, on view September 8–23, 2017 during building hours, 8–8 pm daily.

Continue reading